NEW HAVEN, Conn. - Ruling that a consumer in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) lawsuit against a law firm has not shown any "intervening change in the controlling law, new evidence previously not available, clear error of law or manifest injustice warranting modification" of a District Court's order dismissing her claims, a federal judge in Connecticut on March 21 denied the consumer's motion to amend or alter her previous ruling (Fabiola Derisme v. Hunt Leibert Jacobson...(read more)Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Clik here to view.
