DAYTON, Ohio - The only reasonable interpretation of a counterclaim against a jeweler insured is that it is a fraud claim, which is not covered under a business owners special policy, an Ohio federal judge ruled March 4, granting the insurer's motion for judgment on the pleadings (John Stafford, et al. v. Jewelers Mutual Insurance Co., No. 12-050, S.D. Ohio, Western Div.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29011)....(read more)![]()
↧