WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Supreme Court on April 22 declined to review the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that a consumer who alleged that a New York City provider of electricity-generating capacity violated antitrust laws by engaging in a swap transaction lacks antitrust standing because he was an indirect purchaser and that his claims are otherwise barred by the filed-rate doctrine (Charles Simon v. KeySpan Corporation, et al., No. 12-919, U.S. Sup.; See February 2013)....(read more)![]()
↧