OTTAWA, Ill. - An insurer has no duty to defend its insureds for an underlying suit alleging damages to cropland as a result of the insureds' construction of a holding pond because the policy specifically excludes coverage for interference with the natural drainage of water to or from the land of others, the Third District Illinois Appellate Court said April 24 (Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Larry Hubbs, et al., No. 3-11-0861, Ill. App., 3rd Dist.)....(read more)Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Clik here to view.
