BIRMINGHAM, Ala. - An Alabama couple did not establish that they were entitled to disputed coverage and did not present "sufficient evidence of dishonest purpose" by their insurer, an Alabama federal judge ruled April 18, finding that the insurer was not liable for either normal or extraordinary bad faith in a dispute over purported tornado damage (Gene Peoples, et al. v. Property & Casualty Insurance Company of Hartford, et al., No. 2:11-cv-03788, N.D. Ala.; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55299...(read more)![]()
↧